I wrote a 38.9, trajectory as shown in the following figure, but identified as 389, what is the matter?
Best Answer
O
Olivier @MyScript
said
over 5 years ago
Dear Jiquan Qing,
Thank you for contacting us and pointing this behavior.
Currently, several things occur in this:
-First, the comma appears to be too high, and looks more like the "minus" symbol
-The 9 is too tall compared to the other digits
-And last, it appears we do a filtering, which removes your ink in between the 8 and 9 (your comma).
Nevertheless, the filtering doesn't occur if doing a proper comma and a 9 with a size similar to the 3 and 8. We then recommend to have a "good" ink quality.
currently, the recommendation we usually provide is to have an ink that is recognizable by a human being.
Honestly, for such ink, I would read "38-9" ; as the "-" is tool small, I would not consider it "minus" for sure.
Also, character size should be consistent.
Best regards,
Olivier
j
jiquan qing
said
over 5 years ago
Olivier ,Thank you for your reply.
So it seems that we need as much standard input as possible in order to identify better.
O
Olivier @MyScript
said
over 5 years ago
Answer
Dear Jiquan Qing,
Thank you for contacting us and pointing this behavior.
Currently, several things occur in this:
-First, the comma appears to be too high, and looks more like the "minus" symbol
-The 9 is too tall compared to the other digits
-And last, it appears we do a filtering, which removes your ink in between the 8 and 9 (your comma).
Nevertheless, the filtering doesn't occur if doing a proper comma and a 9 with a size similar to the 3 and 8. We then recommend to have a "good" ink quality.
jiquan qing
Hello：
I wrote a 38.9, trajectory as shown in the following figure, but identified as 389, what is the matter?
Dear Jiquan Qing,
Thank you for contacting us and pointing this behavior.
Currently, several things occur in this:
-First, the comma appears to be too high, and looks more like the "minus" symbol
-The 9 is too tall compared to the other digits
-And last, it appears we do a filtering, which removes your ink in between the 8 and 9 (your comma).
Nevertheless, the filtering doesn't occur if doing a proper comma and a 9 with a size similar to the 3 and 8. We then recommend to have a "good" ink quality.
Best regards,
Olivier
- Oldest First
- Popular
- Newest First
Sorted by Newest FirstOlivier @MyScript
Dear Jiquan Qing,
currently, the recommendation we usually provide is to have an ink that is recognizable by a human being.
Honestly, for such ink, I would read "38-9" ; as the "-" is tool small, I would not consider it "minus" for sure.
Also, character size should be consistent.
Best regards,
Olivier
jiquan qing
Olivier ,Thank you for your reply.
So it seems that we need as much standard input as possible in order to identify better.
Olivier @MyScript
Dear Jiquan Qing,
Thank you for contacting us and pointing this behavior.
Currently, several things occur in this:
-First, the comma appears to be too high, and looks more like the "minus" symbol
-The 9 is too tall compared to the other digits
-And last, it appears we do a filtering, which removes your ink in between the 8 and 9 (your comma).
Nevertheless, the filtering doesn't occur if doing a proper comma and a 9 with a size similar to the 3 and 8. We then recommend to have a "good" ink quality.
Best regards,
Olivier